Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-26 04:15:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2DBB1B46F0EAA3E3567C3E3FD6E79C35FC0A744D35253273B58186EBC1330989
Participant Details

Original Note:

The "debunked by scientists" note is not even supported by the author's own link. The link article cites one guy's opinion on the quality of the study and no debunking information.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1904609910534344797
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2DBB1B46F0EAA3E3567C3E3FD6E79C35FC0A744D35253273B58186EBC1330989
  • createdAtMillis - 1742962507653
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19046099105343447972DBB1B46F0EAA3E3567C3E3FD6E79C35FC0A744D35253273B58186EBC1330989