Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-03 09:46:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69492BD6D0B421BE32EC8338C4AE3E489E43AEFFA8884F96FB6369424FC8B9F0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note contradicts itself. It first denies a pre/post-surgery comparison but then confirms comparing individuals who had and had not undergone surgery. This suggests the study does assess post-surgery outcomes, undermining the claim it doesn't. What the FUCK!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1896287764506886289
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69492BD6D0B421BE32EC8338C4AE3E489E43AEFFA8884F96FB6369424FC8B9F0
  • createdAtMillis - 1740995173024
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 189628776450688628969492BD6D0B421BE32EC8338C4AE3E489E43AEFFA8884F96FB6369424FC8B9F0