Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-02-09 04:29:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C51716CEC4431E27F53F1E589A6BA621C8F2FBFB7C1B0FE886099D6AC0FA46F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The judge has no authority what so ever to judicate a hearing against the executive branch without their being anyone present on the defense, let alone no violation of the Constitution has been sited, which is what the law would require to advance such a motion. https://www.fjc.gov/history/administration/judicial-review-executive-orders https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/intro.7-2/ALDE_00000031/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1888349832089112686
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C51716CEC4431E27F53F1E589A6BA621C8F2FBFB7C1B0FE886099D6AC0FA46F
  • createdAtMillis - 1739075369014
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18883498320891126860C51716CEC4431E27F53F1E589A6BA621C8F2FBFB7C1B0FE886099D6AC0FA46F