Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-07 09:55:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E456A2E1A6DE4A43EAE460BBF0B2D94DBF7246CA47FC19EF73DC744231A5AE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The UK Alzheimer's Society page claiming there is "no evidence" was last reviewed in 2022 so it may be outdated by these newer studies. Also the logicallyfacts.com "fact check" mistakenly claims Roh et al was a "pre-print", but QJM is a peer-reviewed journal and the article was published.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1876525685910700277
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E456A2E1A6DE4A43EAE460BBF0B2D94DBF7246CA47FC19EF73DC744231A5AE9
  • createdAtMillis - 1736243753817
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18765256859107002779E456A2E1A6DE4A43EAE460BBF0B2D94DBF7246CA47FC19EF73DC744231A5AE9