Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-28 05:57:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8AB2882810415E54B019DF7CA44034C635607156BC0DDB4EBC123A29C10A44B7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Este tuit menciona cifras del DANE, pero expertos han cuestionado la transparencia y metodología de la entidad desde 2023. La falta de acceso a microdatos y cambios metodológicos opacos generan dudas sobre la credibilidad de estas cifras. Más contexto: https://www.lasillavacia.com/silla-nacional/opacidad-en-el-dane-sus-datos-cuestionados-suelen-favorecer-a-petro/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1872712901997314154
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8AB2882810415E54B019DF7CA44034C635607156BC0DDB4EBC123A29C10A44B7
  • createdAtMillis - 1735365461885
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18727129019973141548AB2882810415E54B019DF7CA44034C635607156BC0DDB4EBC123A29C10A44B7