Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-13 17:07:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29332379C457F66D169FD59EE8609767B706FCA8CAC6F1661D1D61BFF58F932C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Puede que necesite una nota, pero no la propuesta. Lenguaje tendencioso, claramente partidista, y las “fuentes fiables” no pueden ser tweets diciendo “es fake”, se necesita algo más (que yo no he encontrado, si no pondría nota)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1867613196242022410
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29332379C457F66D169FD59EE8609767B706FCA8CAC6F1661D1D61BFF58F932C
  • createdAtMillis - 1734109649329
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186761319624202241029332379C457F66D169FD59EE8609767B706FCA8CAC6F1661D1D61BFF58F932C