Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-07 11:13:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35501A3F9249E0893FE8C3514D973D88E8F5B89C574D70BF34F21D74BD5E8246
Participant Details

Original Note:

当該サイトに六四天安門事件についての内容はなかったこと、「六四天安門」という言葉が「検索よけ」に使われていることなどから毎日新聞社の主張にはこの書き込みを最も合理的に説明できています。よってノートは不要です https://honichi.com/news/2019/10/02/chinesecensorship/ https://www.todaishimbun.org/frontierscience_kakikomi_20241207/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1865210957531877530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35501A3F9249E0893FE8C3514D973D88E8F5B89C574D70BF34F21D74BD5E8246
  • createdAtMillis - 1733570031029
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 186521095753187753035501A3F9249E0893FE8C3514D973D88E8F5B89C574D70BF34F21D74BD5E8246