Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-05 13:12:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 345E5F7B3E9078CACE79ED89E154DCECB18E6184E769562B03C0C25F9124265D
Participant Details

Original Note:

There’s no evidence their AI models have a 90% error rate. That’s only alleged in a lawsuit, based on flawed understanding of what an actual error rate is: https://arstechnica.com/health/2023/11/ai-with-90-error-rate-forces-elderly-out-of-rehab-nursing-homes-suit-claims/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864597581742899307
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 345E5F7B3E9078CACE79ED89E154DCECB18E6184E769562B03C0C25F9124265D
  • createdAtMillis - 1733404342023
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1864597581742899307345E5F7B3E9078CACE79ED89E154DCECB18E6184E769562B03C0C25F9124265D