Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-04 22:27:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4D22A630223B4D4E22AB5800B9068EE603B51F966E97011ECF25682F074A2C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post refers to a NYTimes article from 2010. The inference falsely leads a reader to think it’s from current NYC vote count. The post also falsely claims the count favors Harris. Which is not possible since Harris wasn’t a candidate in 2010. https://t.co/mKVufB1w6Z

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864388270861451340
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E4D22A630223B4D4E22AB5800B9068EE603B51F966E97011ECF25682F074A2C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1733351270916
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864388270861451340E4D22A630223B4D4E22AB5800B9068EE603B51F966E97011ECF25682F074A2C9