Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-04 15:21:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C4A3F9A6A6E85B445DF5D70F861910AADE1DB3F4D8537092E9B79DC165AD1C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

El titular es sensacionalista, dando la impresión de que ha ocurrido algo inédito porque "la jueza no concreta indicios ni delitos", cuando lo normal es que no lo haga hasta finalizar la instrucción. Lo atípico y poco frecuente en este caso es más bien el recurso de la fiscalía https://x.com/iuristoteles/status/1864245596791492761

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864304246273003809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C4A3F9A6A6E85B445DF5D70F861910AADE1DB3F4D8537092E9B79DC165AD1C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1733325691514
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18643042462730038094C4A3F9A6A6E85B445DF5D70F861910AADE1DB3F4D8537092E9B79DC165AD1C1