Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-04 08:03:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9E83F93F356CD368F1D4267DC199776ABFAB9879372FE2D1A91DEF57CE1BE6C
Participant Details

Original Note:

While itโ€™s true is this really CN worthy? Recycled, bad content is a form of free expression, no matter how degenerate it may be. Iโ€™m giving the proposed note a big DOOM!๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿผ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864085899367068079
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9E83F93F356CD368F1D4267DC199776ABFAB9879372FE2D1A91DEF57CE1BE6C
  • createdAtMillis - 1733299413570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1864085899367068079B9E83F93F356CD368F1D4267DC199776ABFAB9879372FE2D1A91DEF57CE1BE6C