Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-03 23:48:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E9338EC60840B082E72D01C7D3C69F7FBFE93EE9D32F6946EE5BA53A65E96C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

While itโ€™s true is this really CN worthy? Recycled, bad content is a form of free expression, no matter how degenerate it may be. Iโ€™m giving the proposed note a big DOOM!๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿผ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1864085899367068079
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E9338EC60840B082E72D01C7D3C69F7FBFE93EE9D32F6946EE5BA53A65E96C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1733269707778
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18640858993670680793E9338EC60840B082E72D01C7D3C69F7FBFE93EE9D32F6946EE5BA53A65E96C7