Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-02 21:21:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 882AFCB35C4BF8C70AFA6D3FF29309D67D0BFE841F49473D89463519FEE5A5CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source for this story hardly seems reliable. The document was apparently copied in 1914 and claims to reproduce a debate that occurred in 1165. The editor of the Internet Medieval Sourcebook admits he was unable to “verify the historicity of this document.” https://x.com/mirchond/status/1863651905609589178?t=dcrtFUoKoE8VTxEZzvqrFA&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1863675201441108467
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 882AFCB35C4BF8C70AFA6D3FF29309D67D0BFE841F49473D89463519FEE5A5CF
createdAtMillis - 1733174486753
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1863675201441108467882AFCB35C4BF8C70AFA6D3FF29309D67D0BFE841F49473D89463519FEE5A5CF