Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-03 14:04:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 655C9121C1A9A2E95C78D35C84AFABA9E1C86B2D146578A33A830C970822B1CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

割合の母数は当然アンケートに回答した方の数ですから、「8割が存続を求める」との見出しに間違いはなく、誤解も生みません。 「アンケートに回答していない医師がいるのは、存続を求めていないからだ」という憶測をコミュニティノートとして述べる必要はありません。 https://mainichi.jp/articles/20241202/k00/00m/040/016000c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863591220213424297
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 655C9121C1A9A2E95C78D35C84AFABA9E1C86B2D146578A33A830C970822B1CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1733234687623
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1863591220213424297655C9121C1A9A2E95C78D35C84AFABA9E1C86B2D146578A33A830C970822B1CB