Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-03 12:17:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FBCA04AC0094F6D937BD3FFAC3F0ABA925E28180772801702EBFF28E2FE7F59
Participant Details

Original Note:

誤解を招きかねない見出しをしてるので補足すると本記事内に < アンケートは4回目で、9月1~30日、今年5月以降のトラブルについて保険医1002人に調査。66人(機関)が回答した。 と書いてあるように9割以上の医師が回答してない事に注意が必要です。 https://mainichi.jp/articles/20241202/k00/00m/040/016000c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863556672087880100
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FBCA04AC0094F6D937BD3FFAC3F0ABA925E28180772801702EBFF28E2FE7F59
  • createdAtMillis - 1733228231213
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18635566720878801004FBCA04AC0094F6D937BD3FFAC3F0ABA925E28180772801702EBFF28E2FE7F59