Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-02 23:10:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F21F12F0C68626162C02D74C365DE7965CCCD76792C89028D288B548F65A3B4E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the claim (per abstract) is that the literature hints at prejudices and thereby makes a case for prejudice itself, having formed that literature. OP made an interpretation that is technically correct, more interpretations could be made, but should be left to the comments. https://x.com/DrAllyLouks/status/1862454376645677222

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1863261856904958176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F21F12F0C68626162C02D74C365DE7965CCCD76792C89028D288B548F65A3B4E
  • createdAtMillis - 1733181016826
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1863261856904958176F21F12F0C68626162C02D74C365DE7965CCCD76792C89028D288B548F65A3B4E