Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-20 20:01:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DF636E22E563048FD450DAB5AD4CBE1E9376E0FFF3491AE09E4D9BC502C3F99
Participant Details

Original Note:

Klarstellung: Der BGH hat festgestellt: Es ging nicht um „Kinderschutz“, sondern um bewusste Rechtsbeugung. Geltendes Recht vorsätzlich zu missachten, ist ein Angriff auf den Rechtsstaat. https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2024/2024222.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1859291700902216136
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7DF636E22E563048FD450DAB5AD4CBE1E9376E0FFF3491AE09E4D9BC502C3F99
  • createdAtMillis - 1732132919753
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18592917009022161367DF636E22E563048FD450DAB5AD4CBE1E9376E0FFF3491AE09E4D9BC502C3F99