Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-19 12:39:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9955EEAE95F7566E2C8D8183E9D393AC52D5E01862A1D1CE2AD0878461BC713
Participant Details

Original Note:

「明確に知事からパワハラを受けたと言う人はいなかったが、自分ではパワハラにあたるか判断ができないと言う人もいたので、聞いた事実がパワハラにあたるか評価したい。」 という回答の一部を切り取ったものです。 https://youtu.be/eD34d53DAPU?si=C-rJKR94pfNd5526&t=397

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1858765146019229740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9955EEAE95F7566E2C8D8183E9D393AC52D5E01862A1D1CE2AD0878461BC713
  • createdAtMillis - 1732019993956
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1858765146019229740C9955EEAE95F7566E2C8D8183E9D393AC52D5E01862A1D1CE2AD0878461BC713