Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-16 09:13:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5BC0526D64B18A701D00AADD78C1F1855A5023C4B87CB1EA7CFD230A7FCE8AC5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Pas besoin de note pour affirmée qu'il a remboursé car le sujet n'est pas la et le poste dit qu'il vons enquêter, donc il n'affirme rien du tous

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857527148103319628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5BC0526D64B18A701D00AADD78C1F1855A5023C4B87CB1EA7CFD230A7FCE8AC5
  • createdAtMillis - 1731748412428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18575271481033196285BC0526D64B18A701D00AADD78C1F1855A5023C4B87CB1EA7CFD230A7FCE8AC5