Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 23:58:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB3FF9D63BE685094E7F74DB79C3D36103BF4A2D15EC90A0C48CFA2F759285B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

あたかもコスタイベ(レプリコンワクチン)が世界中で開発中止、申請取下、承認却下等が行われているかのような言説ですが、そのような事実はありません(p.6,53) https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10601000/001305553.pdf コスタイベの安全性と有効性は治験で良好と評価されています。 死亡はプラセボ群が16(COVID19:9)に対して接種群では5(COVID19:1)と減少しており、特段の懸念は認められません https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47905-1 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10906000/001316061.pdf https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2024/P20240917001/780009000_30500AMX00282_A100_1.pdf https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_qa.html#20 IF値の高い医学誌・科学誌の査読済論文、WHOや先進国民主主義の政府機関の公式発表等の原典を参照しましょう。 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_qa.html#34 https://togetter.com/li/2416068 https://togetter.com/li/2131189 https://togetter.com/li/2174198

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1857039861720449092
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB3FF9D63BE685094E7F74DB79C3D36103BF4A2D15EC90A0C48CFA2F759285B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1731715093808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1857039861720449092DB3FF9D63BE685094E7F74DB79C3D36103BF4A2D15EC90A0C48CFA2F759285B3