Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 08:48:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF61E59B462B5D41AEB7DC9082A71F84BB1AA2F40A94C5998E3D532EB9AEF7F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

この金額をわいろだと称する投稿を引用拡散していますが、誤解を招く古い誤情報です。 この支払いは賄賂のような類のものでもなく、またこれと引き換えに承認されるというものでもなく、30年前の法律に基づき、製薬会社が自社製品のFDA承認を申請する際に義務付けられている「申請料」です。 https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/apr/05/tweets/pfizer-did-not-bribe-fda-approval-its-covid-19-vac/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856970009677099152
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CF61E59B462B5D41AEB7DC9082A71F84BB1AA2F40A94C5998E3D532EB9AEF7F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1731574120791
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856970009677099152CF61E59B462B5D41AEB7DC9082A71F84BB1AA2F40A94C5998E3D532EB9AEF7F5