Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-13 12:35:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E161CDED8CB7EF9FEE8622B9D8C1C2690C5D5843270929CF0F5F853577DAE50
Participant Details

Original Note:

This has in fact been posted on X https://x.com/guardian/status/1856659228649271588?s=46&t=10qg0eHX8REvnrc1aoPjhA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856667803664724089
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E161CDED8CB7EF9FEE8622B9D8C1C2690C5D5843270929CF0F5F853577DAE50
  • createdAtMillis - 1731501311368
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18566678036647240899E161CDED8CB7EF9FEE8622B9D8C1C2690C5D5843270929CF0F5F853577DAE50