Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-10 00:09:01 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F50CDB8C25073D2243293C4EF5A19EB87C8D15DF6C1B3E3DE549E4188385C213
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The article is available to read and clearly explains the proposed legislature which would indeed lower the age of constent to 9. The proposed note isn't just completely unnecessary but it also misses the point of the post entirely. Leave your religious bias out of CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855370444297384222
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F50CDB8C25073D2243293C4EF5A19EB87C8D15DF6C1B3E3DE549E4188385C213
  • createdAtMillis - 1731197341438
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1855370444297384222F50CDB8C25073D2243293C4EF5A19EB87C8D15DF6C1B3E3DE549E4188385C213