Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-10 22:42:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71B27AF029F421201EFC6F64400ECF80100DE87287C9346EA07162CCBF6F472C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The article is available to read and clearly explains the proposed legislature which would indeed lower the age of constent to 9. The proposed note isn't just completely unnecessary but it also misses the point of the post entirely. Leave your religious bias out of CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855370444297384222
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71B27AF029F421201EFC6F64400ECF80100DE87287C9346EA07162CCBF6F472C
  • createdAtMillis - 1731278565769
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185537044429738422271B27AF029F421201EFC6F64400ECF80100DE87287C9346EA07162CCBF6F472C