Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-10 12:35:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C061C1C6F21F083B02BF19B7E710F1CE20B8E377C07DD3017AF95D15DF99D81
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The article is available to read and clearly explains the proposed legislature which would indeed lower the age of constent to 9. The proposed note isn't just completely unnecessary but it also misses the point of the post entirely. Leave your religious bias out of CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855370444297384222
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C061C1C6F21F083B02BF19B7E710F1CE20B8E377C07DD3017AF95D15DF99D81
  • createdAtMillis - 1731242113573
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18553704442973842224C061C1C6F21F083B02BF19B7E710F1CE20B8E377C07DD3017AF95D15DF99D81