Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-10 02:56:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DE9678FCC253ABDBF96D21389B46B3832ED9E9ADA9E1D5E54648BD6002CD481
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The article is available to read and clearly explains the proposed legislature which would indeed lower the age of constent to 9. The proposed note isn't just completely unnecessary but it also misses the point of the post entirely. Leave your religious bias out of CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855370444297384222
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1DE9678FCC253ABDBF96D21389B46B3832ED9E9ADA9E1D5E54648BD6002CD481
  • createdAtMillis - 1731207390062
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18553704442973842221DE9678FCC253ABDBF96D21389B46B3832ED9E9ADA9E1D5E54648BD6002CD481