Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-10 01:01:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 169D2EB0CE4FAED029CE904443460D0C85651746DF09A0E57E6B11180B88C5D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

下記の研究について触れています。 https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/1982 この話はインフルワクチン等と比較したコロナワクチンのVAERSと呼ばれる任意の因果関係を賭wな愛有害事象報告数の報告率の事ですが(上記リンク こうした任意の報告は報道や https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X13004874 販売後の時間等 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/8/1/117 多様な影響を受けCDCは因果関係推定には使えないとVAERSの説明項目で明示しています https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html#:~:text=VAERS%20is%20the%20nation's%20early,make%20sure%20vaccines%20are%20safe. 例えばわが国の副反応疑い報告でも同じコロナワクチンでも最初の4ロットと比べると22年の最初の4ロットでは全副反応疑い報告率は約百分の1です(下記74P https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10601000/00109164.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855242874423763250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 169D2EB0CE4FAED029CE904443460D0C85651746DF09A0E57E6B11180B88C5D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1731200487983
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1855242874423763250169D2EB0CE4FAED029CE904443460D0C85651746DF09A0E57E6B11180B88C5D0