Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 02:54:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0C7EC6E489A6C59578F80EDA1E0132BE3431A1520981EA7CF7A5C702710B6AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Each of the statements made are opinion based. The first is relative to the perspective of the author, the second is the authors opinion on the best next step, the third is the authors optimism considering their view on the previous. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854220726305538077
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0C7EC6E489A6C59578F80EDA1E0132BE3431A1520981EA7CF7A5C702710B6AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1731034491267
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854220726305538077B0C7EC6E489A6C59578F80EDA1E0132BE3431A1520981EA7CF7A5C702710B6AA