Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 20:16:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 153FF6A8E6B4DCB8A5D2C05D052FB973B7539AED508E4DD215E428E49F34A7F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health did not hold that regulation of abortion is purely a states’ issue. It held that the right to abortion is not a substantive due process right that states are required to provide. Federal legislation is possible under Commerce Clause. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853871413892993328
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 153FF6A8E6B4DCB8A5D2C05D052FB973B7539AED508E4DD215E428E49F34A7F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1730837799259
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1853871413892993328153FF6A8E6B4DCB8A5D2C05D052FB973B7539AED508E4DD215E428E49F34A7F3