Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 22:58:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15E122191C4B4A817F11F9437FB7A268760FF1E12D5AD1D88CDA1D467CF8E2C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

「不起訴不当にひっくりかえった」は事実誤認です。 10月9日の検察審査会の議決で「不起訴相当」になったのは萩生田氏本人で、記事にある10月23日の議決で「不起訴不当」になったのは萩生田氏の秘書です。 https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/20241104-OYT1T50046/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853748216677994840
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15E122191C4B4A817F11F9437FB7A268760FF1E12D5AD1D88CDA1D467CF8E2C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1730847511208
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185374821667799484015E122191C4B4A817F11F9437FB7A268760FF1E12D5AD1D88CDA1D467CF8E2C1