Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-04 00:29:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FEF63F645471FBE4F829ADD7F0DAE73B7E019F2AED95B0547E8F40A91D66483
Participant Details

Original Note:

“..not “around $400k” as he claims” OP makes no such claims. Even if the tax statement wasn’t redacted, the photo itself is proof that the bill was $8000, therefore the OP is factual.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853048914745663863
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FEF63F645471FBE4F829ADD7F0DAE73B7E019F2AED95B0547E8F40A91D66483
  • createdAtMillis - 1730680156485
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18530489147456638639FEF63F645471FBE4F829ADD7F0DAE73B7E019F2AED95B0547E8F40A91D66483