Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-31 23:29:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5AD271D7BBEF5D8550DDEB4E03806A09B60F4A5F72A374760EF0E0C02A073FBA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Three proposed notes, identical to one another in phrasing and linked source. Two of the notes are authored by the same CN contributor. Linked detail is no more reliable than the OP article. Proposed notes appear to be a politically motivated coordination to suppress OP.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851981210345410568
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5AD271D7BBEF5D8550DDEB4E03806A09B60F4A5F72A374760EF0E0C02A073FBA
  • createdAtMillis - 1730417357562
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18519812103454105685AD271D7BBEF5D8550DDEB4E03806A09B60F4A5F72A374760EF0E0C02A073FBA