Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-26 01:37:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8AC5DE591444CF3BC0D684135E40C0D26890DE0E23C4EF23198F5C0450EF0549
Participant Details

Original Note:

O próprio perfil admitiu tê-lo elogiado, como podemos verificar no tweet arquivado – e no tweet original (com o elogio), já apagado, mas também salvo na web. admissão de culpa https://archive.is/qM1uT tweet original https://archive.is/wp7u6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849832671544770665
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8AC5DE591444CF3BC0D684135E40C0D26890DE0E23C4EF23198F5C0450EF0549
  • createdAtMillis - 1729906645491
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18498326715447706658AC5DE591444CF3BC0D684135E40C0D26890DE0E23C4EF23198F5C0450EF0549