Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 23:44:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFF36FD994CC807D8DD67FB37022A8CFB6A1D0EE5FDAF278905167CC2E8FC3DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Writing "High Quality Source" doesn't make them high-quality. The number of views doesn't say anything about its success because people joking about it will also count towards that number. The comments give an indication and in the end, it's an opinion. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848504015459365170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFF36FD994CC807D8DD67FB37022A8CFB6A1D0EE5FDAF278905167CC2E8FC3DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1729554293667
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848504015459365170EFF36FD994CC807D8DD67FB37022A8CFB6A1D0EE5FDAF278905167CC2E8FC3DD