Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-19 15:14:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D28E102B71D1CF47C92ABF7E4200285E0A0947C06476D3F56C8B9C76DAFE05DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

If Poilievre were to accept the restrictions that come with the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) report, he would be unable, by law, to ever comment on it. Poilievre has top level security clearance as a member of the Privy Council. https://youtu.be/27fVCW8JVdU?si=nuxpgZgjH0Ck4S99

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847421573566791754
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D28E102B71D1CF47C92ABF7E4200285E0A0947C06476D3F56C8B9C76DAFE05DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1729350875455
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1847421573566791754D28E102B71D1CF47C92ABF7E4200285E0A0947C06476D3F56C8B9C76DAFE05DA