Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 15:51:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 798B887D2D624488796078BA9D1593ABF5BE2663C80841057CA68F7D2BD4FC2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

If Poilievre were to accept the restrictions that come with the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) report, he would be unable, by law, to ever comment on it. Poilievre has top level security clearance as a member of the Privy Council. https://youtu.be/27fVCW8JVdU?si=nuxpgZgjH0Ck4S99

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847421573566791754
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 798B887D2D624488796078BA9D1593ABF5BE2663C80841057CA68F7D2BD4FC2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1729612289494
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1847421573566791754798B887D2D624488796078BA9D1593ABF5BE2663C80841057CA68F7D2BD4FC2A