Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-29 22:14:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13829F3917CCB2B9EF1E1C0BE5F90DEA7B39EC1D87E0028682C72B85BB4E71D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

If Poilievre were to accept the restrictions that come with the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) report, he would be unable, by law, to ever comment on it. Poilievre has top level security clearance as a member of the Privy Council. https://youtu.be/27fVCW8JVdU?si=nuxpgZgjH0Ck4S99

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847421573566791754
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13829F3917CCB2B9EF1E1C0BE5F90DEA7B39EC1D87E0028682C72B85BB4E71D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1730240073441
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 184742157356679175413829F3917CCB2B9EF1E1C0BE5F90DEA7B39EC1D87E0028682C72B85BB4E71D0