Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-16 15:32:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 394EE71F8D7A61FB0073AFB8B5D421D3E16D063E365F1831B5471121C21A0BB8
Participant Details

Original Note:

El post presenta un análisis sin sustento alguno e intenta tergiversar una fotografía que no contiene mensajes subliminales. https://revistas.um.es/daimon/article/view/9081/8831

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846299555840589838
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 394EE71F8D7A61FB0073AFB8B5D421D3E16D063E365F1831B5471121C21A0BB8
  • createdAtMillis - 1729092742550
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1846299555840589838394EE71F8D7A61FB0073AFB8B5D421D3E16D063E365F1831B5471121C21A0BB8