Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-16 15:13:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16975F88C2E762B4852BD520EB3FE620FEE216464D320030B760FD57E6CC9B16
Participant Details

Original Note:

El post presenta un análisis sin sustento alguno e intenta tergiversar una fotografía que no contiene mensajes subliminales. https://revistas.um.es/daimon/article/view/9081/8831

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1846299555840589838
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16975F88C2E762B4852BD520EB3FE620FEE216464D320030B760FD57E6CC9B16
  • createdAtMillis - 1729091629526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 184629955584058983816975F88C2E762B4852BD520EB3FE620FEE216464D320030B760FD57E6CC9B16