Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-08 07:07:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 713F3A8B7B237082C47D15B568AFC973A277E89063DAA4C43471F87F02A4A745
Participant Details

Original Note:

The currently proposed note saying FEMA refuted this is irrelevant. FEMA's statement at the link provided was about "international efforts or border related issues" and has nothing to do with COVID-19 spending. https://www.fema.gov/node/funding-fema-disaster-response-was-diverted-support-international-efforts-or-border-related

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1843487422618771836
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 713F3A8B7B237082C47D15B568AFC973A277E89063DAA4C43471F87F02A4A745
  • createdAtMillis - 1728371259697
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1843487422618771836713F3A8B7B237082C47D15B568AFC973A277E89063DAA4C43471F87F02A4A745