Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-08 02:09:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6455AB8776A4EDC8A9DD9EB5B8D13ABF0EFFDEABD56B6720055BB740EE41BC5C
Participant Details

Original Note:

引用元を見ればわかりますが、週刊文春や週刊現代でこの疑惑が報じられたのはそれぞれ2003年、2008年ですが、未だ証拠はなく、判明とは言えないことに注意してください。 コミュニティノートは誤解を招く可能性があるツイートに背景情報を提供します。 https://help.x.com/ja/using-x/community-notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1842419509816422843
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6455AB8776A4EDC8A9DD9EB5B8D13ABF0EFFDEABD56B6720055BB740EE41BC5C
  • createdAtMillis - 1728353383269
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18424195098164228436455AB8776A4EDC8A9DD9EB5B8D13ABF0EFFDEABD56B6720055BB740EE41BC5C