Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 14:56:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D7A1C9D9452DF16A805B4F8F71AB981264EE042C7C6A794B57D7029DDD90B1D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die beiden Autoren haben den Artikel von Dr. Ute Krüger scheinbar nicht gelesen. Frau Dr. Ute Krüger kann ihre Ausführungen sehr gut belegen. Nur eine groß angelegte wissenschaftliche Untersuchung kann ihre These widerlegen wozu Faktenchecker nicht qualifiziert sind.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841837503851966814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D7A1C9D9452DF16A805B4F8F71AB981264EE042C7C6A794B57D7029DDD90B1D
  • createdAtMillis - 1728053763346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18418375038519668145D7A1C9D9452DF16A805B4F8F71AB981264EE042C7C6A794B57D7029DDD90B1D