Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 07:15:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C17C8F776FB6300620D7BFD8FDFBF24287E5663C0EF36BE7CC5426073CA9215F
Participant Details

Original Note:

L’étude présentée n’est pas suffisamment fiable scientifiquement pour tirer ces conclusions. Les auteurs eux-mêmes précisent en annexes les problèmes méthodologiques rencontrés. Plusieurs scientifiques remettent en cause méthode et conclusions. Il n’y a pas de consensus. https://x.com/kako_line/status/1746224317778551077?s=46&t=QFY5jM36GQxrLGR9djGBzA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840809740374516172
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C17C8F776FB6300620D7BFD8FDFBF24287E5663C0EF36BE7CC5426073CA9215F
  • createdAtMillis - 1727766909508
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840809740374516172C17C8F776FB6300620D7BFD8FDFBF24287E5663C0EF36BE7CC5426073CA9215F