Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 15:58:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75CBFD3BD67FA7D7FAE67698A6093ED954E39A9FC50EE83ADABF9F03AF507E98
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, die vorgeschlagene Notiz ist argumentativ und unnötig. Es gibt verschiedene Rechtsauffassungen ob der Herr Treutler eine Geschäftsordnungsdebatte hätte verhindern dürfen und das entscheidet nun der Verfassungsgerichtshof https://www.zeit.de/politik/2024-09/thueringen-verfassungsgericht-parlament-afd-alterspraesident

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839645757420306730
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75CBFD3BD67FA7D7FAE67698A6093ED954E39A9FC50EE83ADABF9F03AF507E98
  • createdAtMillis - 1727452696562
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183964575742030673075CBFD3BD67FA7D7FAE67698A6093ED954E39A9FC50EE83ADABF9F03AF507E98