Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 23:03:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59649C11B6587F3A62B471C71A39D62EA84470F11EA11722C1D7E1CE76F2E541
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, die vorgeschlagene Notiz ist argumentativ und unnötig. Es gibt verschiedene Rechtsauffassungen ob der Herr Treutler eine Geschäftsordnungsdebatte hätte verhindern dürfen und das entscheidet nun der Verfassungsgerichtshof https://www.zeit.de/politik/2024-09/thueringen-verfassungsgericht-parlament-afd-alterspraesident

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1839645757420306730
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 59649C11B6587F3A62B471C71A39D62EA84470F11EA11722C1D7E1CE76F2E541
createdAtMillis - 1727650988996
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 183964575742030673059649C11B6587F3A62B471C71A39D62EA84470F11EA11722C1D7E1CE76F2E541