Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-14 19:49:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2EF1264C968999B0508C1E9B6BBDCB8B273E5F638D07849A2FBC15E8B2A96D3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims that Raygun's husband was involved in the selection process or was a judge at the qualifiers has been debunked. The other claims do not have enough evidence to be proven true or false at this time. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/no-rayguns-olympic-selection-not-an-inside-job/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823778665978818915
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2EF1264C968999B0508C1E9B6BBDCB8B273E5F638D07849A2FBC15E8B2A96D3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1723664969620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18237786659788189152EF1264C968999B0508C1E9B6BBDCB8B273E5F638D07849A2FBC15E8B2A96D3D