Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 20:19:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46276E753A8A9E6BC35428B45A2725F9F0351FD15ED685AF05C6F06956E9F71E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - La note de communauté est inutile car elle joue sur les mots. Dire que les 180 000 € ne sont pas que pour le logo mais aussi pour la charte graphique du CHU revient quasiment au même.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823307347806072930
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46276E753A8A9E6BC35428B45A2725F9F0351FD15ED685AF05C6F06956E9F71E
  • createdAtMillis - 1723580369163
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182330734780607293046276E753A8A9E6BC35428B45A2725F9F0351FD15ED685AF05C6F06956E9F71E