Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 13:18:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64418734CE6308EF4C21457B67769124239F3EA481D5AD666515811730CFA0D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post expresses Peter's opinion that she will eventually be found innocent and her accusers will be found guilty, perhaps on appeal. The sources cited against her prove nothing but the fact she lost today, which everybody knows. The note is not needed and is superfluous. https://www.cpr.org/2024/08/12/tina-peters-trial-verdict/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1823284404845781186
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64418734CE6308EF4C21457B67769124239F3EA481D5AD666515811730CFA0D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1723555119006
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182328440484578118664418734CE6308EF4C21457B67769124239F3EA481D5AD666515811730CFA0D4