Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-11 14:24:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DEF0686F544F7462266262B36B129E7AA823636A7F904D534CDBA3BCB8F5F359
Participant Details

Original Note:

The statement contains several logical fallacies. 1. False Dichotomy 2. Straw Man 3. Hasty Generalization 4. Begging the Question 5. ad Hominem In addition: neither the Harris - Walz campaign nor their supporters can be defined by any of the definitions of a cult https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/logic_in_argumentative_writing/fallacies.html https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/ https://dictionary.apa.org/cult

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822623524860621005
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DEF0686F544F7462266262B36B129E7AA823636A7F904D534CDBA3BCB8F5F359
  • createdAtMillis - 1723386282870
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1822623524860621005DEF0686F544F7462266262B36B129E7AA823636A7F904D534CDBA3BCB8F5F359