Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-10 14:07:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E50D79A696038A2892BDA52A918F9CF555BE5B96DC774A8A4561ADBD05F471AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post is misleading. The operative word is "for". The conviction reported on was in fact not for posting on social media per se, but inciting violence against racial minorities. If the OP used e.g. "following", instead of "for", no note would be necessary. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/aug/09/two-men-jailed-for-social-media-posts-that-stirred-up-far-right-violence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1822233624424399011
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E50D79A696038A2892BDA52A918F9CF555BE5B96DC774A8A4561ADBD05F471AD
  • createdAtMillis - 1723298849196
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1822233624424399011E50D79A696038A2892BDA52A918F9CF555BE5B96DC774A8A4561ADBD05F471AD